Tadao Maruko v Versorgungsanstalt der deutschen Bühnen (September 6, 2007) and Jürgen Römer v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (July 15, 2010) – Court of Justice of the European Union These …
Tadao Maruko v Versorgungsanstalt der deutschen Bühnen (September 6, 2007) and Jürgen Römer v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (July 15, 2010) – Court of Justice of the European Union These …
These cases go hand in hand as important decisions by the Court of Justice of the European Union with respect to survivor’s pension and social security rights for registered partners …
Court held that conduct may be discriminatory if two persons are treated alike while their situations are significantly different. Thlimmenos, a Greek national, was refused an appointment as a chartered …
This is the Act governing UK law that aims to prevent inequality as well as discrimination and harassment concerning personal characteristics/sex/pay/victimization against employees at the workforce. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15
This case is about pay differences based on sex and the possibility of discrimination. Here, the claimants worked as carers for special needs children and claimed that male …
Domnica Petersen v. Berufungsausschuss für Zahnärzte für den Bezirk Westfalen-Lippe (January 12, 2010) – European Court of Justice Germany had implemented a maximum age of 68 for panel dentists (essentially …
The applicant was the father of a young woman who died in Cyprus where she had gone to work in March 2001. He complained that the Cypriot police had not …
This case concerns the connection between religious beliefs and discrimination based on sexual orientation. Here, the claimant refused to officiate civil partnership based on her religious beliefs. The Court decided …
The report shows a good practice for protection migrant workers in Mauritania and Senegal. ITUC helps Mauritania to build a migrant workers center in Nouakchott to provide assistance to Senegalese …
This case explains discrimination with respect to philosophical beliefs held by employees. The Court held an employee’s philosophical beliefs are protected – and therefore are a belief – provided …